An argument against lowering the legal drinking age in the united states

- the government is conducting an idea to whether lower the minimum legal drinking age in the united states or not many americans forbid the idea of legalizing the drinking age so that it would be profitable to the businesses. The purpose of having the legal drinking age at 21 is supposedly to protect children from the negative effects of alcohol however, having the drinking age so high has the opposite effect on teens not having alcohol normal and easily accessible has made teens tend to drink more excessively when they have the chance. The efforts to reduce the adverse effects of drinking for teens by making the drinking age 21 have failed it is ineffective and only causes more problems in addition, having a drinking age higher than the age where people assume many other important rights is ridiculous.

By 1984, the federal government backed by madd (mothers against drunk driving), ordered all 50 states (through the national drinking age act) to raise their legal drinking age to 21 years of age or suffer cuts in their annual allotted federal highway dollars. There are a number of arguments as to why the legal drinking age in the united states, now set in most states at 21, should be lowered, remain the same, or be raised it helps to have some historical background on the drinking age. Still, some states had lower drinking ages and underage individuals often would cross state lines to drink legally, the report says with strong support from mothers against drunk driving, the national parent teacher association and other groups, congress in 1984 passed a law that gave states a financial incentive to adopt a higher drinking age.

Underage drinking: lowering the legal drinking age in the united states hum 200 assignment 2: factors in favor of and against finding “factors for” and “factors against” a position is a versatile tool for critical thinkers. Pros and cons of lowering the drinking age to 18 do the benefits outweigh the costs kyle brown opponents would argue that this trend would also occur in the united states if the drinking age were lowered the biggest argument for lowering the drinking age is that drinking should simply be a basic right for an adult, which includes 18. The liberty argument is pretty simple, too: drinking alcohol is an enjoyable activity adults under 21 should not be denied that enjoyment when other pleasurable activities are legal at age 18 maybe it is better to have a higher legal drinking age, but the age of 21 is not ordained by god. Although the above argument about lowering the drinking age may be legitimate, the argument against lowering the drinking age is also a valid one furthermore, it is a more compelling and persuasive position research substantiates the contention that the legal drinking age should remain at 21.

Between 1970 and 1976, 30 states lowered their minimum legal drinking age (mlda) from 21 to 18, 19, or 20 the enactment of the national minimum drinking age act of 1984 prompted states to raise their legal age for purchase or public possession of alcohol to 21 or risk losing millions in federal highway funds.

At present, the legal drinking age for alcohol in the united states is 21, which is higher than the legal drinking age in many other developed countries (heather & stockwell 213) advocates who have an argument in support of lowering the drinking age contend that if they have certain rights and responsibilities that seem more “adult at a younger age—such as fighting for the country, paying taxes, and getting married—they should certainly be allowed to drink. Underage drinking in the united states this article will explore the history of the legal drinking age in the united states as well as the prevalence of underage drinking in other countries with lower legal drinking ages in place to bolster the argument of lowering the drinking age, proponents will points to european countries in.

An argument against lowering the legal drinking age in the united states

The uniform drinking act, which compelled states to set the legal drinking age at 21 by withholding ten percent of highway funding from states that kept the minimum legal drinking age at 18, is an example of federal government overreach into state affairs. In “responses to arguments against the minimum drinking age,” the national institute on alcohol abuse and alcoholism (niaaa) identifies arguments against the minimum legal drinking age and then suggests counter arguments.

Age 21 minimum legal drinking age a minimum legal drinking age (mlda) of 21 saves lives and protects health minimum legal drinking age (mlda) laws specify the legal age when an individual can purchase or publicly consume alcoholic beverages the mlda in the united states is 21 years. Our northern neighbor, canada, has a drinking age of 18 or 19, depending on the province, and our southern neighbor, mexico, sets the age at 18 most european countries go with 18, and the others go even lower in fact, more countries have a legal drinking age lower than 18 than set it at 21. Lowering the legal drinking age: an analysis of the pros and cons background since the mid 1930’s, the legal drinking age in the united states has been set at 21 but during the vietnam war, in consideration of young people in military service, 29 states lowered the legal drinking age. Minimum legal drinking age (mlda) laws specify the legal age when an individual can purchase or publicly consume alcoholic beverages the mlda in the united states is 21 years however, prior to the enactment of the national minimum drinking age act of 1984, the legal age when alcohol could be purchased varied from state to state 1.

Fox news reports that 157 college-age individuals (ages 18 to 23) drank themselves to death from 1999 through 2005 given the epidemic of binge drinking among minors lowering the drinking age would be like subjecting a few dozen more americans, each year, to the firing squad. - the legal drinking age in the united states will always be a point of contention no one can settle upon a drinking age that everyone is in agreement with should it be 18 or 21 ages 18 and 21 are the most popular options, yet neither one has 100% of the vote. In addition, having a drinking age higher than the age where people assume many other important rights is ridiculous people between the ages 18 and 21 are considered second-class citizens because of their age.

an argument against lowering the legal drinking age in the united states Responses to arguments against the minimum legal drinking age the federal government is spending taxpayer money in a questionable political campaign to defend the minimum drinking age against attempts in some states to lower it. an argument against lowering the legal drinking age in the united states Responses to arguments against the minimum legal drinking age the federal government is spending taxpayer money in a questionable political campaign to defend the minimum drinking age against attempts in some states to lower it. an argument against lowering the legal drinking age in the united states Responses to arguments against the minimum legal drinking age the federal government is spending taxpayer money in a questionable political campaign to defend the minimum drinking age against attempts in some states to lower it.
An argument against lowering the legal drinking age in the united states
Rated 3/5 based on 25 review
Download